
Every day, animal shelters struggling with overcrowded kennels often find themselves reactive rather than strategic. But with the right approach to managed intake, shelters worldwide can join the growing movement of facilities prioritizing both animal welfare and staff wellbeing.
What does managed intake mean?
Managed intake is a process regulating or scheduling the intake of animals to the shelter. The goal is to ensure that animals are admitted in a way that’s humane and appropriate, while also preventing the shelter from becoming overcrowded. It is one of the tools helping shelters to manage their capacity for care.
Similar to human hospitals and veterinary systems, managed intake prioritizes animals most in need of immediate help for admission. Less urgent cases receive alternative support while owners await their chance to surrender. This thoughtful prioritization ensures shelters’ limited resources are allocated to animals requiring the most critical assistance, enabling facilities to operate proactively rather than reactively.

More Resources
Definition:
- Best Friends: Setting the record straight on managed intake
- Maddie’s Fund: Million Cat Challenge | Managed Admission
- National Animal Care & Control Association (NACA) Guidelines: NACA Guideline on Appointment-Based Pet Intake into Shelters
Webinar:
- 2020 American Pets Alive Conference: Is Managed Intake Humane?
- 6th National G2Z Summit & Workshops: Dr Cynthia Karsten – Managed Intake
- ASPCA Conference: Managing Intake & Reuniting Pets with Families
- ASPCApro: Northern Tier Shelter Initiative Zoomies: Shelter Intake Meets Capacity for Care
Why is managed intake important?
Uncontrolled intake models create significant unpredictability, posing major operational challenges for shelters. These facilities risk overcapacity, leading to insufficient staff and space for animal care, a heightened risk of disease, and increased euthanasia rates due to lack of space. Conversely, they may be forced to turn away urgent cases, such as animal abuse.
This unpredictability also contributes to staff burnout, hinders meaningful animal welfare work, and forces reactive rather than strategic decision-making.
What are the alternatives to intake?
Under the managed intake system, some owners may not be able to surrender their animals immediately. In place of the owner bringing in the animals, a conversation takes place where shelter staff attempt to offer other solutions to keep people and pets together. Shelters can support owners by providing alternatives such as financial assistance, housing help, or dog training. As for found strays, shelters can implement a finder-foster program which provides assistance for the finder to keep the dog in the neighborhood, raising the chances of reuniting the dog with his family.
As for owners who are determined to rehome their pets, supported self-rehoming could be an option.
More Resources
Keeping People and Pets Together
Does data indicate that managed intake reduces owner surrenders?
Research offers valuable insights into how managed intake systems affect owner surrenders. One study from a Canadian shelter that implemented managed intake found that only 31% of cats on a relinquishment waiting list were ultimately surrendered to the facility. This suggests a significant diversion from traditional intake, as 15% were re-homed directly by their owners, and 10% were retained by their owners. However, the outcome for a substantial 43% remained unknown, as owners did not respond to follow-up appointments.
Further supporting the efficacy of diversion strategies, another study revealed that 87% of dog owners utilizing supported self-rehoming platforms successfully diverted their dogs away from shelters. Of these, 54% found new homes for their dogs, and 33% decided to keep their original pets. Specifically, data indicates that when owners face longer rehoming periods or extended relinquishment wait times, they often find alternative solutions instead of surrendering their dogs to a shelter.
These findings are corroborated by a separate quantitative interview with a panel of shelter professionals, who confirmed that managed intake empowers pet owners to find alternatives while simultaneously enhancing shelter organization and planning.
More Resources
Data Supporting Managed Intake:
Why the controversy around managed intake?
Managed intake systems face criticism, primarily from those who argue that by not immediately accepting animals, shelters are inadvertently contributing to more free-roaming pets and potentially creating dangerous dog packs in communities. This concern is not entirely unfounded, especially given research indicating that 43% of animals on relinquishment waitlists had unknown outcomes when owners didn’t respond to follow-up appointments. It’s undeniable that some owners might resort to releasing their pets when shelters cannot accept them. However, comprehensive research on the actual prevalence of this outcome is currently lacking.
What is undeniable, however, is that unmanaged intake systems lead to operational chaos and significant animal welfare challenges within shelters. Therefore, it’s crucial for managed intake shelters to engage thoughtfully with their communities, asking key questions and actively offering alternatives that empower people to keep their pets, mitigating the risk of abandonment.
This video highlights the importance of excellent customer service and navigating the balance required for effective managed intake.
How to determine your intake protocol?
Your protocol should be set up with your community and public safety in mind. Create 2-3 tiers of urgency for intake, prioritizing cases where human and/or animal safety is threatened. Create flowcharts to help your front-line staff navigate different situations. Besides having a clear protocol, it is important to provide the right training for your front-line staff to handle different situations and for them to learn to ask appropriate questions.

More Resources
Sample Protocols
- Managed Intake or Admissions Training Playbook
- City of Edmonton: Scheduled Intake
- Enid SPCA: Animal Intake Policy and Protocols
How to plan for the number of intake?
Shelters should understand how many available kennels they are likely to have in the days, weeks, and even months to come.
Begin with the desired population of animals, such as one based on your capacity for care. One tip from the Oregon Humane Society and ASPCA is to maintain the population below maximum capacity, such as at 80%. This will allow the shelter to be flexible in handling emergencies.
Furthermore, estimate the number of non-owner surrenders (e.g. strays that you must hold) that will arrive on any given day. Do so by calculating the monthly daily average (MDA) by dividing the historical number of non-owner surrenders admitted during a given month by the number of days in the month. By comparing your desired population, your existing population, and your expected daily mandatory intake, you will have a clearer view of how many animals you might be able to take in on a specific day.
More Resources
Calculating Shelter Capacity
- Koret Shelter Medicine Program: Calculating shelter capacity, Shelter Intake and Pathway Planning
What are the best practices for a transition towards managed intake?
More Resources
Making Managed Intake A Success
- DVM360: Managed intake and capacity for care: The tools for remarkable population management
- HASS: Code Red: 12 Tips for Managing Intake During a Space Crisis
- Maddie’s Webcast: Intake Mitigation and Managed Intake (Best Practices from Brevard County)
Explanation of Managed Intake to the Public
- Fresno Humane Animal Services: Intake Policy — Fresno Humane Animal Services
- Saskatoon SPCA: How to Surrender a Pet to Saskatoon SPCA
Managing Large Intakes
How to empower the community to help with managed intake?
The Power of Supported Self-Rehoming
The community can help the managed intake process by exploring alternatives, including the use of supported self-rehoming. Supported self-rehoming provides pet owners with resources, connections, and assistance to rehome their own pets, without that animal having to enter the custody of the animal services agency. This often involves pet owners finding a new owner directly on rehoming websites, such as Rehome or Home to Home, thereby bypassing the step of animals entering the shelter and becoming stressed.
Supported self-rehoming is particularly useful when there is a long wait time for shelter placement. In addition, pet parents get peace of mind knowing that they can select the best family for their pets, without the pet ever facing the risk of euthanasia. Studies show that pets rehomed directly by their families experience less stress and transition more successfully to new homes compared to animals that enter shelter systems.
Shelters can support pet parents by offering guidance on taking quality photographs and writing compelling descriptions, while also cross-promoting available pets on their websites or social media platforms. This collaborative approach transforms potential surrenders into community-driven solutions that benefit both animals and shelters.
Building Community Foster Networks
The public can also help by becoming foster caregivers, offering temporary homes and allowing animals to be diverted when urgent circumstances arise and the shelter is full. Communities respond positively when they understand both challenges and opportunities to contribute meaningfully to animal welfare outcomes.
When Transparency and Support Drive Success
The most effective shelters engage with the community by being transparent and providing comprehensive support throughout the surrender process. Shelters must make their processes transparent on their websites, with surrender applications readily available. Staff should follow up promptly, helping community members by gathering essential information about the pet, providing alternative options to surrendering, and helping to schedule relinquishment appointments when necessary. Staff should follow up regularly to ensure that the owner was able to work through their options.
Success in managed intake depends on community members understanding their role in keeping families together and supporting shelter sustainability. This requires closing knowledge gaps about available alternatives, surrender prevention resources, and the realities of shelter operations.
More Resources
Supported Self-Rehoming
- HASS: Supported-Self-Rehoming Resource Guide (including sample documents)
- HumanePro: The power of supported self-rehoming
Community Fostering
What are some toolkits for professionals implementing managed intake?
Are there relevant courses for professionals implementing managed intake?
What’s the urgency in focusing on managed intake now?
Uncontrolled intake creates significant stress for both animals and shelter staff, particularly when facilities are already full. An overcrowded environment heightens the risk of disease outbreaks and increases the need for euthanasia. This, in turn, intensifies the mental burden on staff already contending with daily unpredictability.
Managed intake reduces the unpredictability in owner surrenders, with an intake request that leads first to conversation. This gives shelter staff a chance to help, to offer assistance that might be more immediate and readily available, and an opportunity to keep families and pets together.
With proven frameworks now available and successful implementations demonstrating effectiveness, strategic intake management by local shelters — supported by national organizations like Best Friends and HASS — will determine which communities achieve sustainable animal welfare operations.
Resolving this challenge through managed intake will require transparency, humility, and compassion from both the shelter and the community. The animals in your care — and the staff dedicated to helping them — are counting on organizations like yours to move beyond reactive crisis management toward the systematic, evidence-based approach that finally creates sustainable shelter operations.