Improving Rehoming Success: Enlarging Adoption Pipeline

Data and facts about how shelters can expand their adoption pipeline.

Jump to: Overview | Acquisition Source | Shelter Acess | Social Media

Highlights


Overview


Dog Acquisition Source

Jump to: Stated Preference (U.S.) | Social Desirability on Stated Preference (U.S.) | Acquisition Source by Income (U.S.)

Stated Preferences for Source in the U.S.

External link: 
Bir C, Widmar NJO, Croney CC. Stated Preferences for Dog Characteristics and Sources of Acquisition. Animals. 2017; 7(8):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080059

Preferences

Class 1Class 2Class 3
“Adoption Only”“To Each Their Own”“Homes for the Homeless Dogs”
Demographicsn = 103n = 195n = 209
Gender of respondent
Male n = 25417%50%33%
Female n = 25323%27%50%
Age of respondents
18–34 n = 13315%39%46%
35–54 n = 18216%41%43%
55–88 n = 19228%36%36%
Income of respondents
Lower income n = 33420%38%43%
Higher income n = 17321%40%39%
Education of respondents
No college degree n = 29821%38%40%
College degree n = 20919%39%43%
Region of residence
Northeast n = 9224%36%40%
South n = 18523%37%40%
Midwest n = 11720%39%41%
West n = 11313%42%44%
Respondent owns a pet
Yes n = 31620%32%48%
No n = 19121%49%30%

Related data from the same study (Understanding Adopter Preferences)

Research Summary | Back to Top

Social Desirability Bias on Stated Preferences for Dog Acquisition

External link: 
Bir C, Olynk Widmar N, Croney C. Exploring Social Desirability Bias in Perceptions of Dog Adoption: All’s Well that Ends Well? Or Does the Method of Adoption Matter? Animals. 2018; 8(9):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8090154

Stated Preferences

Sources Not to Be Used to Acquire A Dog
Statement Regarding Dog AcquisitionNumber of Respondents
(n = 767)
Percentage
Are there any locations or methods you would NOT use to obtain a dog
Adoption (shelter or rescue organization)7910%
Breed them myself24131%
Purchased directly from a breeder (on site where dogs are bred/kept)24232%
Purchased directly from a breeder online (via the breeder’s website)35246%
Purchased from online retailer42555%
Purchased from pet store32442%
Stray15320%
Gift from friend/family member9012%
Other (i.e., parking lot)22629%
Beliefs Regarding Dog Acquisition
Statement and Agreement Level by Number of Responses and %
1 (agree) to 7 (disagree)
1234567
The only responsible way to acquire a dog is through shelter/rescue124, 16%110, 14%119, 16%162, 21%92, 12%62, 8%98, 13%
All dogs should be spayed/neutered208, 27%93, 12%94, 12%160, 21%63, 8%51, 7%98, 13%
There is a dog overpopulation problem in the U.S.225, 29%103, 13%86, 11%169, 22%61, 8%52, 7%71, 9%
Dogs in pet stores come from irresponsible breeders119, 16%99, 13%96, 13%228, 30%93, 12%53, 7%79, 10%
Breeding of dogs for sale is socially irresponsible121, 16%79, 10%97, 13%203, 26%97, 13%71, 9%99, 13%
People should be able to buy purebred dogs259, 34%105, 14%94, 12%134, 17%65, 8%48, 6%62, 8%
People should have choices as to where/how to obtain dogs245, 32%143, 19%99, 13%120, 16%67, 9%40, 5%53, 7%
Shelter dog populations would decrease if people stopped buying purebred dogs158, 21%87, 11%77, 10%199, 26%77, 10%75, 10%94, 12%
Every shelter/rescue dog is adoptable164, 21%113, 15%95, 12%161, 21%85, 11%69, 9%80, 10%
Importing of dogs for sale is irresponsible241, 31%105, 14%81, 11%163, 21%63, 8%57, 7%57, 7%
Importing of dogs for adoption is irresponsible188, 25%95, 12%101, 13%164, 21%71, 9%72, 9%76, 10%
The sale of dogs is socially irresponsible104, 14%66, 9%83, 11%191, 25%109, 14%96, 13%118, 15%
Dog Acquisition Sources and Rationale
Statement Regarding Dog Ownership or CareNumber of Dog Owners
(n = 446)
%
How have you acquired a dog?
Adoption (shelter or rescue organization)17840%
Bred them myself174%
Purchased directly from a breeder (on site where dogs are bred/kept)9020%
Purchased directly from a breeder online (via the breeder’s website)256%
Purchased from online retailer112%
Purchased from pet store389%
Stray5913%
Gift from friend/family member13430%
Other (i.e., parking lot)307%
Reasons for acquiring dog in that manner
Impulse buy4410%
Reputation of the breeder4310%
Reputation of the rescue/shelter6615%
Previous experience7417%
Wanted a specific breed or type of dog13330%
Cost5212%
Guilt123%
Peer Pressure112%
It was the right thing to do20847%
Dog came with pet insurance143%
Dog came with training/education245%
Dog came with health guarantee358%
Classifying Respondents by Demographics and Stated Preferences
Share of PreferencesClass 1
“Municipal Animal Shelter First”
Class 2
“Adoption is Great!”
Class 3
“Breed Matters”
Adopted from a pet store1%22%1%
Adopted from a municipal animal shelter66%23%14%
Adopted from a breed rescue21%19%33%
Adopted from a privately-owned shelter11%19%13%
Adopted from a breeder1%17%39%
Class Probability62%29%9%

Related data from the same study (U.S. Owned Dogs)

Research Summary | Back to Top

Acquisition Source by Income Level in the U.S.

External link: 
Kremer T, Neal SM. Where Do They Come From and Where Do They Go? Socioeconomic Patterns in Dog Acquisition and Rehoming. Animals. 2024; 14(9):1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14091378

Source of Dog Acquisition

SourceAmerican Veterinary Medical Association
2017-2018
Best Friends
Animal Society
2022
American Pet Product Association
2017-2018*
American Pet Product Association
2021-2022*
Adopted—shelter/rescue/pet store28%39%44%40%
Friend/relative/another individual37%27%35%31%
Breeder/pet store28%23%29%30%
Found/stray5%5%4%4%
Previous pet2%NA1%4%
* Numbers sum to more than 100% because multiple responses were accepted.
Acquistion Source by Income Level
Income GroupFriend / FamilyFound & RescuedPrevious PetPurchasedShelter / RescueOther
< 15k43%13%9%18%15%3%
15k-35k37%12%9%18%20%3%
35k-50k34%12%5%24%24%1%
50k-75k28%10%5%29%26%2%
75k-100k25%11%4%34%28%1%
100k-150k24%7%4%35%31%1%
150K+19%7%3%37%32%1%

Odds Ratio:

Income GroupFriend / FamilyFound & RescuedPrevious PetPurchasedShelter / Rescue
<15 k (baseline)11111
15–35 k0.80.960.971.051.45
35–50 k0.670.870.541.421.83
50 k–75 k0.50.750.531.892.04
75 k–100 k0.420.790.42.342.02
100 k–150 k0.40.460.352.432.53
150 k+0.30.520.312.732.74

Related data from the same study (Reducing Shelter Intake)

Research Summary | Back to Top


Shelter Access

Jump to: Pilot Program in California

Pilot Program in OCAC, California

External link: 
Mavrovouniotis, M. L. (2024). Comparison of the Number of Dog Adoptions in a Pilot Program That Restored Limited Visitor Access to Kennels: A Community Case Report. Journal of Shelter Medicine and Community Animal Health, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.56771/jsmcah.v3.85

Program Impact

Time Slot
(Jul 19 – Nov 7, 2023)
Non Pilot Days (MTuThFSu)Pilot Days (WeSa)Total
Midday (11am-2pm)227124351
Afternoon (2pm-5pm)227178405
Total454302756
Afternoon as percent of total50%59%
Time Slot
(Jul 19 – Nov 7, 2022)
Non Pilot Days (MTuThFSu)Pilot Days (WeSa)Total
Midday (11am-2pm)230115345
Afternoon (2pm-5pm)21398311
Total443213656
Afternoon as percent of total48%46%
Time Slot
(Jul 19 – Nov 7)
20222023% Change
WeSa 2pm-5pm9817882%
All other opening hours5585784%
Total65675615%
WeSa 2-5pm as % of total15%24%

Research Summary | Back to Top


Social Media

Jump to: Overview of Shelter Posting | Use of Descriptive Adjectives

Overview of Shelter Posting

External link: 
Morrison R, Maust-Mohl M, Ferry T. Exploring Factors That Influence Public Engagement of Adoptable Pets on Facebook. Animals. 2024; 14(22):3217. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14223217

Social Media Posting Trends (2019 and 2020)

  • Photos were the primary medium used (89%).
  • Videos were less frequently used (14%).
  • Most posts featured one animal (77.9%).
  • Dogs were rarely shown in cages (5.8%), while cats were more commonly depicted in cages (23.1%).
  • Few photos or videos showed animals with humans (19%) or toys (cats: 10.9%, dogs: 7.7%).
  • Most dog breeds were listed as unknown (60%), while most cat breeds were listed as domestic short hair (80.31%).
  • Negative tone was rarely used (2%).
  • 18.2% of posts were updated to indicate adoption.

User Engagement

  • Species: Dog posts consistently outperformed cat posts in terms of likes and shares.
  • Year:
    • 2019 posts received significantly more likes.
    • 2020 posts received significantly more shares.
  • Gender: No significant difference in engagement was found between male and female animals.

Research Summary | Back to Top

Use of Descriptive Adjectives in Online Profiles

External link: 
Nakamura M, Dhand NK, Starling MJ, McGreevy PD. Descriptive Texts in Dog Profiles Associated with Length of Stay Via an Online Rescue Network. Animals. 2019; 9(7):464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070464

Descriptive Adjectives and Length of Stay (LOS)

Personality AdjectivePredicted Back-Transformed LOS MeansRatio of Means (95% CI)p-Value
PresentAbsent
Only dog35.1722.381.57 (1.41, 1.75)<0.001
Friendly30.6825.651.20 (1.15, 1.25)<0.001
Make you proud16.1948.520.33 (0.23, 0.47)<0.001
Obedient32.4524.251.34 (1.22, 1.47)<0.001
Dominant35.9621.881.64 (1.36, 1.99)<0.001
Intelligent31.0225.371.22 (1.12, 1.33)<0.001
Timid30.9624.061.22 (1.10, 1.35)0.0002
Sensitive32.7026.261.36 (1.06, 1.74)0.0158
Restless14.3254.970.26 (0.15, 0.45)<0.001
Proud33.3923.571.42 (1.07, 1.87)0.0147
Independent23.4433.580.70 (0.57, 0.85)0.0004
No cats34.1623.041.48 (1.11, 1.98)0.0078
Thorough34.1323.061.48 (1.03, 2.13)0.0346
Happy-go-lucky33.8423.261.45 (1.08, 1.95)0.0127
Eager26.5229.680.89 (0.82, 0.98)0.0126
Lively25.7130.610.84 (0.73, 0.97)0.0162

Aggregated length of stay (days) for the four most common breeds (Staffordshire Bull Terrier, Australian Cattle Dog, Jack Russell Terrier, and Labrador Retriever), by the presence and absence of selected adjectives (n = 20,198 dogs).

Personality AdjectivePredicted Back-Transformed LOS (Days)p-Value
Breed
Australian Cattle DogJack Russell TerrierLabrador RetrieverStaffordshire Bull Terrier
GentlePresent44.7522.8723.4232.23<0.01
Absent36.7124.9020.1426.96<0.01
ActivePresent42.1523.8425.1132.43<0.01
Absent38.9723.9018.7926.8<0.01
QuietPresent45.4423.2122.1832.64<0.01
Absent36.1524.5421.2726.63<0.01
EnergeticPresent54.4629.0922.6833.60<0.01
Absent30.1619.5820.825.87<0.01

Length of stay (days) of the four most common breeds (Staffordshire Bull Terrier, Australian Cattle Dog, Jack Russell Terrier, and Labrador Retriever), by breed and the presence and absence of selected adjectives (n = 20,198 dogs).

Research Summary | Back to Top