Reducing Shelter Intake: Reasons for Intake

Data and facts about reasons for shelter intake.

Jump to: Overview | Demographics | Reasons

Highlights


Overview


Descriptive Demographics

Jump to: Online Purchase Demographics and Relinquishment

Impact of Online Purchase and Relinquishment During Pandemic

External link: 
Carroll GA, Torjussen A, Reeve C. Companion animal adoption and relinquishment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Households with children at greatest risk of relinquishing a cat or dog. Anim Welf. 2023;32:e56. Published 2023 Aug 18. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2023.77

Relinquishment or Those Who Considered Relinquishment

  • Geographical Variation:
    • USA: 9.9%
    • Canada: 6.4%
    • Spain: 5.8%
    • Italy: 4.4%
    • UK: 3.0%
  • Demographic Factors:
    • Gender: Male participants had a 49.6% increased probability of relinquishment compared to females.
    • Age of Pet: For every one-year increase in pet age, there was a 91.5% decreased probability of relinquishment.
    • Household Composition:
      • Households with children were 4.6 times more likely to consider or have already relinquished a cat or dog compared to those from households without children
Demographic VariableConsidered Relinquishment (%)Never Consider Relinquishment (%)
Species
Cat41.747.9
Dog58.352.1
Gender
Male66.749.7
Female33.350.3
Dwelling type
House with garden65.656.3
House with no garden5.33.6
Apartment with garden17.215.1
Apartment with no garden11.925
Home ownership
Own58.369.6
Rent41.730.4
Children in the home
0 children35.170.1
1 child27.813.9
2 children32.511.9
3 or 4 children4.64.1
Adults in the home
1 adult7.912.9
2 adults4947.4
3 adults21.917
4 adults10.618.6
5 or more adults10.64.1
Other pets in the home
Yes43.740.2
No56.359.8
Martial status
Married/partner65.654.1
Single31.141.8
Seperated0.72.1
Divorced2.62.1
Education
Secondary school19.932.5
College/University degree5143.8
Master’s degree23.820.6
Doctoral degree21
Other professional graduate/PG degree3.32.1
Employment
Employed69.563.9
Not working14.614.9
Student22.1
Retired13.919.1
Illness
Mental5.37.2
Physical5.37.2
Reason for acquisition
Companionship9496.9
Use as a service animal5.30
Training/Competitions6.70.5
Working animal20
Other3.95.1

Related Data From Same Study (Acquisition Channels)

Research Summary | Back to Top

Reasons

Jump to: Social Vulnerability & Intake, Outcome | Texas Shelter Intakes & Returns

Social Vulnerability & Intake, Outcome

External link: 
Neal SM, Kremer T. Examining the Relationship Between Social Vulnerability and Animal Shelter Intakes and Outcomes: Patterns and Implications. Animals. 2024; 14(22):3166. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14223166

Intake and Outcome by Social Vulnerability

Social Vulnerability QuintileIntake per 1000 householdsAdoption per 1000 households
1911
21312
31812
43614
56114
Quintile 1 is the least socially vulnerable and 5 is the most vulnerable.

Breakdown by Intake Source

Intake from Social Vulnerability QuintileBreakdown by Intake Source
Social Vulnerability QuintileOverallOwner Surrender / ReturnSeized / CustodyStray
18.0%11.9%4.6%6.8%
28.7%11.1%5.9%8.1%
311.9%14.4%9.8%11.1%
424.5%25.5%27.9%23.5%
546.9%37.1%51.8%50.6%
Quintile 1 is the least vulnerable and 5 is the most vulnerable. (n = 42,291 animals)
Adoptions to Social Vulnerability QuintileBreakdown by Intake Source
Social Vulnerability QuintileOverallOwner Surrender / ReturnSeized / CustodyStray
119.2%20.6%25.3%17.4%
217.6%18.8%21.1%16.4%
317.4%18.3%18.4%16.8%
420.1%20.3%19.8%20.0%
525.6%22.0%15.4%29.3%
Quintile 1 is the least vulnerable and 5 is the most vulnerable. (n = 42,291 animals)

Breakdown by Social Vulnerability Index Themes

Intake by Social Vulnerability QuintileBreakdown by SVI themes
Social Vulnerability QuintileOverallHousehold CharacteristicsHousing Type & TransportationRacial & Ethnic Minority StatusSocioeconomic
Status
18.0%12.7%12.2%4.2%7.6%
28.7%10.0%18.7%9.7%7.3%
311.9%15.0%25.7%13.3%13.0%
424.5%19.8%22.8%20.8%21.6%
546.9%42.4%20.6%52.0%50.6%
Quintile 1 is the least vulnerable and 5 is the most vulnerable. (n = 42,291 animals)
Adoptions to Social Vulnerability QuintileBreakdown by SVI themes
Social Vulnerability QuintileOverallHousehold CharacteristicsHousing Type & TransportationRacial & Ethnic Minority StatusSocioeconomic
Status
119.2%21.5%20.1%12.2%19.2%
217.6%15.3%21.2%22.1%15.9%
317.4%18.6%22.5%20.7%17.9%
420.1%18.8%19.8%16.0%19.7%
525.6%25.8%16.4%28.9%27.2%
Quintile 1 is the least vulnerable and 5 is the most vulnerable. (n = 42,291 animals)

Breakdown by Animal Type

Intake by Social Vulnerability QuintileBreakdown by Animal Type
Social Vulnerability QuintileOverallCat AdultCat YouthDog AdultDog Youth
18.0%8.9%7.7%8.9%3.9%
28.7%9.2%8.6%9.6%5.1%
311.9%13.%11.1%12.8%8.0%
424.5%28.5%25.5%24.2%21.0%
546.9%42.0%47.2%44.5%61.9%
Quintile 1 is the least vulnerable and 5 is the most vulnerable. (n = 42,291 animals, with 85,11 cat adults, 10,520 cat youth, 17,814 dog adults and 5,446 dog youths)
Adoptions to Social Vulnerability QuintileBreakdown by Animal Type
Social Vulnerability QuintileOverallCat AdultCat YouthDog AdultDog Youth
119.2%18.2%19.0%21.0%15.4%
217.6%17.7%17.2%19.1%13.6%
317.4%18.6%15.9%18.6%14.8%
420.1%21.6%19.6%19.7%19.7%
525.6%24.0%28.3%21.5%36.6%
Quintile 1 is the least vulnerable and 5 is the most vulnerable. (n = 42,291 animals, with 85,11 cat adults, 10,520 cat youth, 17,814 dog adults and 5,446 dog youths)

Intake Reason and Outcome by Quintile

Intake ReasonQuintile 1Quintile 2Quintile 3Quintile 4Quintile 5
Preferences / Time30.1%25.5%24.2%27.1%22.5%
Permanent Change7.6%8.9%7.8%6%7.7%
Medical5.3%8.2%8.6%12.4%14%
Housing15%15.8%19.7%22.8%25%
Cost11.7%11.4%15.5%16.3%17.2%
Behaviour30.3%30.2%24.3%15.4%13.4%
OutcomeQuintile 1Quintile 2Quintile 3Quintile 4Quintile 5
Transferred Out12.7%19.2%17.5%20.6%28.3%
Return to Owner16.4%14.9%15.6%13.1%10.4%
Euthanasia10.2%10.9%12.5%13.1%13.5%
Adopted60.7%55%54.3%53.3%47.8%

Research Summary | Back to Top

Texas Shelter Intake & Return

External link: 
Hawes SM, Kerrigan JM, Hupe T, Morris KN. Factors Informing the Return of Adopted Dogs and Cats to an Animal Shelter. Animals. 2020; 10(9):1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091573

Reasons for Intake

ReasonsDogs (n = 1604)% of Dog SampleCats (n = 1292)% of Cat Sample
Medical29.6%29.5%
Medical needs of animal24915.5%34927.0%
Medical costs20.1%00.0%
Urgent medical382.4%141.1%
Parvovirus18611.6%00.0%
Panleukopenia00.0%181.4%
Behavioral9.2%5.9%
Aggressive toward animals271.7%30.2%
Aggressive toward humans372.3%30.2%
Destructive tendencies120.8%50.4%
Separation anxiety70.4%10.08%
Behavior/temperament70.4%50.4%
General behavioral support needed573.6%594.6%
Personal8.6%8.4%
Cannot afford basic care221.4%100.8%
Unrealistic expectations613.8%241.9%
Moving301.9%312.4%
Unwanted offspring of pet100.6%00.0%
Medical needs of pet owner60.4%141.1%
Allergies20.1%80.6%
Behavior/temperament of resident pet40.2%181.4%
Death of owner/family member40.2%20.2%
Other52.6%56.2%
Born in shelter care1056.5%292.2%
Stray with shelter’s microchip140.9%100.8%
Stray140.9%201.5%
Breed or species restrictions30.2%00.0%
Wellness10.06%00.0%
Bottle baby281.7%36728.4%
Pregnant/nursing865.4%1189.1%
Shelter space59236.9%18414.2%

Related Data From Same Study (Reducing Adoption Returns)

Related Data From Same Study (Post-Adoption Management)

Research Summary | Back to Top