Optimizing Shelter Operations: Expanding Shelter Capacity

Data and facts about how shelters can expand their capacity by utilizing approaches such as foster care.

Jump to: Overview | Foster

Highlights


Overview


Foster Care

Jump to: How Brief Outing and Temporary Fostering Affect Adoption Chances | Pandemic Lockdown Foster Initiatives

How Brief Outing and Temporary Fostering Affect Adoption Chances

External link: Gunter LM, Blade EM, Gilchrist RJ, Nixon BJ, Reed JL, Platzer JM, Wurpts IC, Feuerbacher EN, Wynne CDL. The Influence of Brief Outing and Temporary Fostering Programs on Shelter Dog Welfare. Animals. 2023; 13(22):3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13223528

Descriptive Statistics of Brief Outing and Temporary Foster Care Programs

  • Total Dogs: 2327
  • Total Intervention Experiences: 3481
    • Brief Outings: 2786
    • Temporary Fostering Stays: 695
  • Dog Participation:
    • Single Experience: 77.1% (1788 dogs)
    • Multiple Experiences: 22.9% (539 dogs)
  • Adoption Status:
    • Available for Adoption: 87.8% of dogs who received an intervention

Foster Caregiver Profile

  • Age: Caregivers were, on average, 39 years old.
  • Community Involvement:
    • Brief Outings: 47.5% of caregivers were community members with no prior shelter relationship. Shelter volunteers provided another 42.7% of outings.
    • Temporary Fostering: 45.4% of caregivers were volunteers, while 37.1% were community members.
  • Shelter Staff Involvement:
    • Brief Outings: 7.7% of outings were provided by shelter staff.
    • Temporary Fostering: 11.3% of stays were provided by shelter staff.
  • Resident Dogs:
    • Over half (50.9%) of temporary foster caregivers did not have resident dogs.
  • Dog Introductions:
    • When caregivers had resident dogs, common introduction methods included:
      • Introducing dogs at the shelter (37.9%)
      • Keeping dogs separated during fostering (35.1%)
      • Introducing dogs at home (27.0%)

Program Details

  • Duration of Interventions:
    • Brief Outings: Average duration of 3 hours.
    • Temporary Fostering: Average duration of 1.6 days.
  • Factors Influencing Duration:
    • Brief Outings:
      • Heavier dogs had shorter outings.
      • Shelter volunteers facilitated longer outings compared to community members.
    • Temporary Fostering:
      • Dog bites led to significantly shorter stays.

Length of Stay for Dogs

  • Average Length of Stay: 35.1 days
  • Pre-Intervention: 32.7 days
  • Post-Intervention: 9.9 days
  • Control Group: 9.5 days
  • Factors Influencing Length of Stay:
  • Dog Characteristics:
    • Heavier dogs had longer stays.
    • Older dogs had longer stays.
  • Temporary Fostering:
    • Female dogs had shorter stays than male dogs.

Outcome

Shelter Outcomes for Brief Outing Dogs
Remain in Care vs. AdoptedTransfer Out vs. AdoptedEuthanized, Lost, or Died in Care vs. Adopted
CovariatesRRRRRR
Female vs. Male Dogs1.060.860.56
Dog Weight (kg)1.020.971.07
Dog Age (months)1.011.010.99
Stray vs. Owner Surrender1.162.443.86
Cruelty/Neglect vs. Owner Surrender1.604.4911.98
Transfer In vs. Owner Surrender0.980.220.77
Shelter Outcomes for Temporarily Fostered Dogs
Remain in Care vs. AdoptedTransfer Out vs. AdoptedEuthanized, Lost, or Died in Care vs. Adopted
CovariatesRRRRRR
Number of Resident Dogs0.821.94<0.001
Female vs. Male Dogs0.921.31<0.001
Dog Weight (kg)1.011.061.04
Dog Age (months)1.000.990.10
Stray vs. Owner Surrender1.1022.20<0.001
Cruelty/Neglect vs. Owner Surrender6.35<0.0010.83
Transfer In vs. Owner Surrender0.502.410.52
  • Positive Outcomes:
    • Adoption: 65.2%
    • Transfer: 8.2%
    • Return to Owner: 0.9%
  • Intervention Impact on Adoption:
    • Brief Outings: 5 times more likely to be adopted than euthanized.
    • Temporary Fostering: 14 times more likely to be adopted than euthanized.
  • Caregiver Adoption:
    • Brief Outings: 4.2%
    • Temporary Fostering: 12.0%
  • Remaining in Organizational Care:
    • 23.6% of dogs remained in organizational care.
    • 98.7% of these dogs were still housed in shelters.

Research Summary | Back to Top

A Study of Emergency Foster Care During COVID

External link: Gunter LM, Gilchrist RJ, Blade EM, Reed JL, Isernia LT, Barber RT, Foster AM, Feuerbacher EN and Wynne CDL (2022) Emergency Fostering of Dogs From Animal Shelters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Shelter Practices, Foster Caregiver Engagement, and Dog Outcomes. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:862590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.862590

Shelter Procedures During Pandemic

CategoryProcess / Procedure% of Shelters
BehaviorRoutine behavioral assessment52.63%
Dog-dog assessment57.89%
– One-on-one with another dog45.45%
– Combination of one-on-one & group interactions45.45%
– Group interactions9.09%
Behavior personnel on staff41.60%
VeterinaryStopped or reduced number of spay-neuter surgeries63.16%
Reduced number of in-house veterinarians36.84%
Reduced partnerships with outside veterinary clinics15.79%
Did not require spay-neuter surgery before adoption26.32%
Adoption ProceduresMeeting requirements
– Humans in the household10.53%
– Dogs in the household21.05%
Meeting location
– Meet at shelter84.21%
– Meet at foster caregiver’s home42.11%
Paperwork location
– Completed at shelter94.74%
– Completed with foster caregiver26.32%
– Completed with shelter, remotely78.95%
– Completed with foster caregiver, remotely5.26%
Adopted dog pick-up
– Inside the shelter94.74%
– Drive-through, at shelter52.63%
– At foster caregiver’s home57.89%
  • Adoption Process:
    • Nearly 90% of organizations did not require all family members to meet the dog prior to adoption.
    • Only 21.05% of shelters required meetings between any resident dog(s) and the shelter dog.
  • Foster Care Practices:
    • Novel approaches to foster animal pickup were implemented during the pandemic.
    • The most common approach was drive-through style (36.13%).
    • Other approaches included:
      • Caregiver going inside the shelter (31.73%)
      • Outdoor pickup with staff (28.38%)
      • Other methods (3.76%)

Foster Caregivers

Number of resident dogs (% of foster caregivers)
Caregiver’s Relationship to the ShelterFostering typeNumber%01234+
No prior relationship
New community memberPuppy523%71.1521.155.771.920.00
Dog62237%74.6018.335.141.290.64
Prior relationship
Shelter volunteerPuppy161%62.5018.7512.506.250.00
Dog674%70.1519.404.485.970.00
Returning community memberPuppy724%80.5612.506.940.000.00
Dog1469%69.8615.754.112.747.53
Returning foster caregiverPuppy18711%28.8815.5127.2717.1111.23
Dog40024%43.7529.0011.0012.004.25
StaffPuppy443%0.0034.0920.4520.4525.00
Dog805%10.0020.0013.7527.5028.75
Finder / ownerPuppy00%0.000.000.000.000.00
Dog161%43.7518.7518.750.0018.75
Overall1702100%56.5220.689.937.585.29
  • Age: The average age of foster caregivers was 36.01 years old.
  • Resident Dogs: Puppy caregivers were more likely to have resident dogs (57.14%) compared to adult dog caregivers (39.67%).
  • Shelter Resource Level and Caregiver Relationship:
    • Low-resource shelters: Relied heavily on caregivers with prior relationships (78.79%).
    • High-resource shelters: Utilized a larger proportion of new community foster caregivers (60.63%).
  • Foster-to-Adopt Rates:
    • Moderately resourced shelters: Had the highest foster-to-adopt rate (43.77%).
    • High-resource shelters: Had the second-highest foster-to-adopt rate (32.84%).
  • Repeat Fostering: 25% of foster caregivers fostered more than once during the four-month data collection period.

Dog Outcome

Positive Outcomes
  • Adoption: Over 83% of fostered dogs and puppies were adopted, primarily from foster homes or with minimal shelter time.
    • Very low-resource shelters had lower adoption rates (43.01%), compared with shelters at other resource levels (over 80%).
  • Transfers: 9.45% were transferred to other organizations.
    • More puppies were transferred out (15.02%) than adult dogs (7.82%). 
    • Very low-resource shelters had higher transfer rates (49.46%), compared to low (6.58%) or moderately (1.67%) resourced shelters.
  • Return to Owner: A very small percentage (0.27%) were returned to their original owners.
  • Remained in Care: In a foster home (4.15%) or at the shelter (1.22%).
Negative Outcomes
  • Less than 2% had negative outcomes:
    • Lost in Care: 0.34%
    • Died in Care: 0.20%
  • Euthanized: 1.02% (0.54% for behavioral, 0.48% for medical) – No puppies were euthanized for behavior.
Length of Stay
  • Overall: Dogs and puppies spent an average of 43.35 days in the care of the organization (shelter + foster).
  • Foster Care:
    • Average: 19.52 days
    • Range: 0 to 176 days
  • Age Correlation: Age had a positive correlation with adult dog length of stay.
  • Foster-to-Adopt: Dogs with potential adopters stayed for 16.18 days (vs. 20.93 days for other cases)
    • 15.74 days if the person adopted (vs. 17.37 days if the person did not adopt)
  • Foster Caregiver Adoptions:
    • Adult Dogs: Length of stay of 28.58 days if adopted (vs. 19.61 days if no adoption).
    • Puppies: Length of stay of 41.61 days if adopted (vs. 20.77 days if no adoption).
    • Only 7% of puppy foster experiences resulted in caregiver adoption.
Factors Affecting Length of Stay
Timing of spay-neuter surgeryFostering typenAverage length of stay
Before intake to the shelterPuppy138
Dog44343.59
At the shelterPuppy9937.36
Dog30148.86
In foster carePuppy1057.7
Dog6290.66
During a foster-to-adoptPuppy3656.08
Dog6857.4
After leaving the shelterPuppy16625.67
Dog18460.04
  • Home Meetings: Shelters allowing potential adopters to meet fosters at home resulted in shorter foster stays (13.73 days), compared to those that did not (21.95 days).
  • Direct Pick-up: Shelters allowing direct pick-up from foster homes also led to shorter stays (15.86 days), compared to those that did not (20.83 days).
Caregiver’s relationship with the shelterAdopted nDid not adopt nAdopted (%)
No prior relationship
New community member19548428.72
Prior relationship
Shelter volunteer127014.63
Returning community member181948.49
Returning foster caregiver315585.26
Staff81166.45
Potential adopter (foster-to-adopt)63423572.96
  • New Caregivers without Dogs: More likely to adopt their fostered dog (77.39% of cases, versus 22.61% for those with dogs).
  • Prior Relationship Caregivers: Adoption rates varied depending on the number of resident dogs. Those without dogs adopted most often (46.15%) as compared to those with one (30.65%), two (14.52%), or three or more dogs (9.68%).

Dogs with Behavioral Needs

  • Behavioral Needs: Approximately 20% of foster dogs required behavioral management.
    • Virtually no puppies (0.62%) required behavioral management. 
  • Bites: Bite incidents were relatively rare (1.1%) and evenly distributed between dog-to-dog and dog-to-human bites.
    • Dogs without known behavioral concerns were more likely to bite
  • Returns: 17% of behaviorally managed foster dogs were returned by caregivers. (Dogs without behavioural issues: 5.3%)

Dogs with Medical Needs

  • Medical Needs: A significant portion of foster dogs required medical management (32.90% for dogs, 21.67% for puppies).
  • Medical Returns: 4.53% of medically managed foster dogs were returned due to medical issues. (Dogs without medical issues: 1.4%)
Reason foster care endedPuppyAdult Dog
Adoption39.6262.43
Behavioral1.089.02
Medical3.232.1
Caregiver-related11.3310.15
Scheduled return by the shelter44.7416.3

Foster Utilization Ratio (FUR)

  • Factors Influencing FUR:
    • 2019 Length of Stay for dogs 6 months and older: for each day that a shelter’s 2019 length of stay was shorter, their FUR increased by slightly more than one-third of a point.
    • Shelter Type: Public municipal agencies had 30 points lower FURs compared to private non-profits. 
  • Public Municipal Agencies:
    • Had the lowest FUR (M = 14.52).
    • Experienced a dramatic increase in FUR during the pandemic (270% increase from March 2020).
  • Private Non-Profit Shelters:
    • Higher FURs compared to public municipal agencies.
    • High FUR during the pandemic: April (M = 48.86) and May (M = 47.48).
  • Pandemic Impact:
    • Overall increase in foster utilization in April 2020 (43% of dogs in foster care), an increase of over 30% compared to before the pandemic.

Research Summary | Back to Top