Offering Better Care: Statistics on Dog Owner Education, Training & Socialization

Data and facts on the efforts to improve dog owner education, training and socialization for our dogs.

Jump to:
Education Campaigns:
Campaign Effectiveness
Dog Training:
Landscape Overview | Standardization & Accreditation

Highlights


Education Campaigns

Jump to: Canada | UK

Campaign Effectiveness

Jump to: RSPCA UK Campaign

Effectiveness of A Dog Welfare Campaign in the UK

External link: 
Philpotts I, Blackwell EJ, Dillon J, Rooney NJ. Do Animal Welfare Education Campaigns Really Work? An Evaluation of the RSPCA’s #DogKind Campaign in Raising Awareness of Separation-Related Behaviours in UK Dog Owners. Animals. 2024; 14(3):484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14030484

Awareness and Engagement
  • Only 21.0% of respondents are aware of the Separation-Related Behaviour (SRB) campaign
  • Of those respondents, 81.6% reported that they had engaged with the campaign
Campaign Discovery: Of those aware of the campaign (n=207)%
RSPCA website41.1
RSPCA newsletter35.2
Facebook47.3
Twitter29.5
Instagram27.5
Google or another search engine16.9
RSPCA stall at an event10.6
RSPCA clinic or rehoming centre9.2
Posters or leaflets2.9
Can’t remember1.9
Engagement by method (n = 169), %
Watched video on the website53.8
Seen and shared Tweet(s)40.2
Read information on the website35.5
Read blogs30.8
Seen and shared Facebook posts29.6
Picked up a leaflet23.7
Given a leaflet to someone they know14.8
Visited an RSCPA stall at an event to discuss SRB12.4
Visited an RSCPA clinic or rehoming centre at an event to discuss SRB6.5
Told someone they know about the campaign3.6
Other0
Changes in Awareness and Behaviour
Before CampaignSix Months After
Awareness of SRB52.5%56.8%
Belief: Average time a dog could be left alone (hours)
  Average 5.886.08
  Occasional 11.7712.38
Average time respondents left their dogs alone (hours)
  Average 5.255.17
  Occasional7.447.96
Happiness of dog when alone6.086.22
How much does SRB affect a dog’s happiness3.153.21
Importance of seeking help for a dog suffering SRB4.424.42
How likely they would seek help if dogs showed signs of SRB3.153.19
  Likely to seek help from a vet63.2%61.9%
  Likely to seek help from a behaviourist41.4%45%
Reported seeking for help
  From a vet29.5%31.4%
  From books12.5%14.9%
Source of Help
Heard of #DogKind %
(n = 207)
Not Heard of #DogKind %
(n = 781)
Have Sought or Would Seek Help
Vet
  Have sought help56.624.7
  Would seek help46.965.9
Vet nurse
  Have sought help39.111.5
  Would seek help58.562.2
Behaviourist
  Have sought help32.95.2
  Would seek help48.844.0
Accredited behaviourist
  Have sought help38.63.1
  Would seek help53.638.5
Trainer
  Have sought help31.46.0
  Would seek help51.245.1
Accredited trainer
  Have sought help29.53.8
  Would seek help55.641.7

Research Summary | Back to Top


Dog Training

Landscape Overview

Jump to: Canada | UK

Canada

Jump to: Dog Training Businesses in BC

Dog Training Business Landscape in B.C.

External link: 
Camila Cavalli, Chris Dunnett, Nicole Fenwick, Characteristics of dog training companies and their services in British Columbia, Canada, Journal of Veterinary Behavior, Volume 77, 2025, Pages 30-41, ISSN 1558-7878, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2024.12.002

Dog Training Methods and Services
CategoryDescriptionPercentage
Method
Reward-basedThe website mentions use of reward-based training exclusively (including “positive training” and the use of treats or play) and no mention of aversive-based or balanced training (including mention of prong, choke or shock collars, or pictures of dogs wearing them).72.24%
Aversive-basedThe website mentions aversive-based or balanced training (including mention of prong, choke or shock collars, or pictures of dogs wearing them). If website mentions both reward-based training and aversive or balanced training it is categorized as Aversive-based14.59%
UnclearThere is not enough information on the website to confirm if the training is reward-based or aversive-based13.16%
Number of trainers
1 – 10, unclearNumber of trainers in the business. If the website does not specify and there is no mention of multiple trainers, it is assumed the business has 1 trainer. If the website mentions more than one trainer but the actual number is not available, this information is considered “unclear”.1: 71.53%
2: 8.89%
3: 5.33%
4: 1.06%
5: 2.49%
6: 2.13%
7: 0.35%
8: 0.71%
9: 0.00%
10:0.71%
Unclear: 6.76%
Mode of training
In-person Group TrainingBusiness offers in person group classes63.70%
In-person Private TrainingBusiness offers in person one-on-one classes86.12%
Online GroupBusiness offers online synchronous group classes3.55%
Online PrivateBusiness offers online synchronous one-on-one classes34.16%
Self-paced VideosBusiness offers access to pre-recorded videos, without synchronous interaction10.32%
Board-and-TrainBusiness offers training without the guardian present while the dog resides with the trainer15.65%
Day TrainingBusiness offers training without the guardian present (at a facility, the dog’s home or during walks)18.86%
Type of training service
Basic TrainingBusiness offers ‘puppy’ classes/programs, training on manners, and/or recall training88.25%
Behavioral ModificationBusiness offers training for behavioral concerns (e.g., fear, reactivity, aggression, etc.)67.61%
Dog SportsBusiness offers dog sports training (e.g., trick training, agility, nosework, herding, etc.)39.50%
Separation AnxietyBusiness offers specific training for separation anxiety6.40%
Service and Therapy Dog TrainingBusiness offers specific training for service or therapy dogs4.62%
Other pet services
Offers Other ServiceBusiness offers any other pet services besides training24.19%
BoardingBusiness offers overnight care at a facility9.96%
Cat trainingBusiness offers training for cats0.71%
Cosmetic dental scalingBusiness offers “anesthesia-free” dental procedures from a non-veterinarian0.71%
DaycareBusiness offers care during the day at a facility9.25%
GroomingBusiness offers grooming procedures (i.e., baths, haircuts, etc.)4.62%
Pet sittingBusiness offers care at the dog’s home4.27%
WalkingBusiness offers dog walking9.60%
Credentials
  • Lack of Specified Credentials: 30.96% of businesses did not explicitly mention the lead trainer’s qualifications.
  • Vague Claims of Certification: Within the above percentage, 5.33% of businesses used terms like “certified” or “professional trainer/instructor” without referencing specific, verifiable credentials.
OrganizationAcronymExamples of Credential(s) offeredPercentage
Absolute Dogs AcademyNonePro Dog Trainer course3.20%
Academy for Dog TrainersNoneCertificate in Training and Counselling (CTC)4.62%
AnimalKindNoneAnimalKind accreditation12.45%
Animal Behavior CollegeABCAnimal Behavior College Certified Dog Trainer (ABCDT)3.55%
Certification Council for Professional Dog TrainersCCPDTCertified Professional Dog Trainer-Knowledge Assessed (CPDT-KA), Certified Professional Dog Trainer-Knowledge and Skills Assessed (CPDT – KSA), Certified Behavior Consultant Canine-Knowledge Assessed (CBCC – KA)25.62%
Companion Animal Sciences InstituteCASIDiploma of Canine Behavior Science and Technology (Dip.CBST), Diploma of Professional Dog Training (Dip.PDT)2.49%
Do More with Your DogNoneCertified Trick Dog Instructor (CTDI)7.82%
Family Dog Mediation Education CenterNoneFamily Dog Mediator4.62%
Fear FreeNoneFear Free certified trainer16.37%
International Association of Animal Behavior ConsultantsIAABCAccredited Dog Trainer (IAABC-ADT), Certified Dog Behavior Consultant (CDBC), Certified Animal Behavior Consultant (CABC)6.76%
Julie NaismithNoneSeparation Anxiety Pro Behavior Consultant (SA Pro)4.27%
Karen Pryor AcademyKPAKaren Pryor Academy Certified Training Partner (KPA-CTP), Karen Pryor Academy Dog Trainer Professional (KPA-DTP), Puppy Start Right for Instructors14.23%
Malena DeMartiniNoneCertified Separation Anxiety Trainer (CSAT)2.13%
Michael ShikashioNoneAggression in Dogs Master Course2.49%
National Association of Canine Scent WorkNACSWCertified Nose Work Instructor (CNWI)3.55%
UnspecifiedNoneMaster Trainer6.40%
Other
  • Female-Led Businesses: 80.78% (227 businesses) appeared to be led by women.
  • Male-Led Businesses: 13.16% (37 businesses) appeared to be led by men.
  • Unclear or Mixed-Gender Leadership: 6.04% (17 businesses) had unclear gender identification or featured mixed-gender training partnerships.

Research Summary | Back to Top

UK

Jump to: Use of UK Canine Professionals

Dog Owners Reporting on their Use of UK Canine Professionals

External link: 
Julie T. Daniels, Debbie Busby, Margo Chase-Topping, Sarah M. Brown, A survey of dog behavior modification practice in the UK: Who is offering it, what methods are they using and how effective do their clients perceive practitioners to be?, Journal of Veterinary Behavior, Volume 59, 2023, Pages 1-7, ISSN 1558-7878, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2022.11.011

Frequency of Unwanted Behaviors
  • Aggression towards other dogs/animals was the most frequently reported behavior (28.6%).
  • Obedience-related issues were the second most common (21.8%).
  • Fearfulness was the third most common (14.0%).
  • Aggression (towards other dogs/animals or people) was the primary reason for seeking CP advice in over half of the cases (55.32%).
Number of Unwanted Behaviours Per Dog
  • The majority of dogs exhibited one to three unwanted behaviors:
    • One behavior: 35.3%
    • Two behaviors: 30.6%
    • Three behaviors: 23.0%
CP Type Consulted
  • Trainers were consulted more frequently for all behaviors except:
    • Aggression towards humans
    • Separation-related problems
DemographicCategoryProportion of respondents (%)
Client sexFemale86.81
Male13.19
Role of dogPet99.57
Working0.43
No. CPs consulted148.51
226.8
316.6
>38.09
Canine professional type most recently consultedVeterinarian1.7
Dog trainer62.13
Behaviorist36.17
Canine professional sexFemale58.3
Male41.7
Consultation typeIn person87.66
Remote12.34

Research Summary | Back to Top


Standardization & Accreditation

Jump to: New Zealand

New Zealand

Jump to: Survey on Industry Perspective

Industry Perspective on National Accreditation for Animal Trainers

External Link:
Skyner LJ, Cameron KE, Dale A, Walker JK. The Need for a National Accreditation Programme for Professionals Working in the Field of Animal Training and Behavioural Modification in New Zealand. Animals. 2020; 10(7):1111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071111

Demographics of 262 Survey Participants
  • Gender:
    • Female: 88.8%
    • Male: 10.3%
      • 19 of 27 male respondents were animal trainers.
  • Age:
    • Over 55 years: 41.1% 
    • 45-54 years: 24.3%
  • Education:
    • Tertiary Certificate/Diploma: 40.1% 
    • Bachelor’s Degree: 22.9% 
    • High School Certificate/Equivalent: 15.7%
Roles
  • Animal Trainers:
    • Specialization: 29.5% of animal trainers specialized in working with a specific species:
      • 88.2% with dogs
      • 7.8% with horses
      • 3.9% with cats
    • Training Methods:
      • Group classes: 74.0%
      • One-on-one sessions: 54.3%
      • Both group and one-on-one: 36.8%
    • Services:
      • Behavioral modification (animals): 30.6%
      • Behavioral modification (clients): 37.0%
      • Training animals for clients: 28.9%
      • Specialized problem behavior: 30.1%
      • All of the above: 13.9%
  • Veterinary Nurses:
    • Behavioral Services:
      • Puppy preschool: 72.2%
      • Behavioral consultations: 22.2%
      • Animal training: 19.4%
      • Problem behavior treatment: 5.5%
  • Veterinarians:
    • Behavioral Services: (45.0% of veterinarians provided this information)
      • Behavioral consultations: 30.0%
      • Animal training: 15.0%
      • Problem behavior assessment/treatment: 5.0%
Membership to an Organization
  • Overall Membership:
    • 49.6% of respondents offering behavioral services were members of an animal training club or organization.
  • Animal Trainers:
    • 58.4% of trainers with organizational membership supported accreditation.
    • 19.9% of trainers with membership were not supportive or unsure.
    • 44.9% of rainers without membership were interested in accreditation.
    • 55.1% trainers without membership were not interested or unsure.
  • Specific Organizations:
    • 41.5% of trainers belonged to APDTNZ.
      • 77.8% of APDTNZ members were interested in accreditation.
    • 33.38% of trainers belonged to a dog club or Dogs New Zealand.
      • 31.8% of these members were interested in accreditation.
    • 24.6% of trainers belonged to other companion animal-related organizations.
Level of Support for Accreditation
  • Overall:
    • 63.0% (165/262) of respondents expressed interest in accreditation.
    • 9.5% (25/262) were not interested.
    • 26.0% (68/262) were unsure.
  • By Profession:
    • Animal trainers had the highest level of uncertainty or disinterest (43.0%).
    • Other professions had lower rates of disinterest or uncertainty (<13.4%).
  • By Education:
    • Respondents with tertiary qualifications (certificates or higher) showed higher support (68.1%) than those with high school certificates (64.5%).
Referring Clients
  • Referral Practices: 76.3% of animal trainers reported referring clients to other professionals.
  • Preference for Accredited Professionals: 79.8% of respondents preferred to refer clients to accredited professionals.
Training Methods
  • Reward-Based Training:
    • The majority of respondents across all professions primarily utilized reward-based training methods.
    • A significant proportion of animal trainers (59.3%), behavioral consultants (93.8%), dog safety educators (81.3%), and veterinary nurses (61.1%) explicitly avoided aversive training techniques.
    • Some animal trainers (20.9%) and veterinary nurses (13.9%) reported using a combination of reward-based and aversive methods, but only when reward-based approaches were deemed insufficient.
    • No participant exclusively relied on aversive training methods.

Research Summary | Back to Top

Scroll to Top