Offering Better Care: Statistics on Youth Education Programs

Data and facts on the efforts of humane education that teaches animal care and empathy to children.

Jump to:
Preschoolers | Primary School

Highlights


Preschoolers

Jump to: Understanding Dog Distres Signals (Lincolnshire, UK) | Dog Bite Prevention Effectiveness (Edinburgh, UK) | Dog Bite Prevention Effectiveness (Turkey)

Ability of Preschoolers to Understand Dog Distress Signals (Lincolnshire, UK)

External link: 
Meints K, Brelsford V and De Keuster T (2018) Teaching Children and Parents to Understand Dog Signaling. Front. Vet. Sci. 5:257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00257

Pre- and Post-training Test Results

Correct %Baseline Test (Test 1)Post-Training (Test 2)After 6 Months (Test 3)After 1 Year (Test 4)
Conflict Escalating Signals
3 year-olds47%50%64%66%
4 year-olds55%72%70%76%
5 year-olds64%83%77%81%
Parents83%100%
Conflict Avoiding Signals
3 year-olds23%26%33%30%
4 year-olds31%27%33%36%
5 year-olds27%42%25%20%
Parents52%93%
Conflict Defusing Signals
3 year-olds16%14%16%14%
4 year-olds13%13%15%17%
5 year-olds20%20%18%13%
Parents28%73%

Research Summary | Back to Top

Campaign Effectiveness of A Dog Bite Prevention Program for Preschoolers (Edinburgh, UK)

External link: 
Lakestani N, Donaldson ML. Dog Bite Prevention: Effect of a Short Educational Intervention for Preschool Children. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134319. Published 2015 Aug 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134319

Pre- and Post-test Results

Average Correct ScoreIntervention Group Pre-testIntervention Group Post-testControl Group Pre-testControl Group Post-test
Total Correct Answers5.07.35.05.3
.. Training videos2.23.62.62.4
.. Test-only videos2.83.82.62.7
Target Behaviours Identified4.49.15.15.4

Research Summary | Back to Top

Campaign Effectiveness of A Dog Bite Prevention Program for Preschoolers (Turkey)

External link: 
Sevim Isparta, Ufuk Kaya, Ozge Sahin, C. Etkin Safak, Ilknur Yardim Ozer, Sarah Heath, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou, Yasemin Salgirli Demirbas, The first assessment of a dog bite prevention program for pre-school children in Turkey, Journal of Veterinary Behavior, Volume 46, 2021, Pages 79-86, ISSN 1558-7878, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2021.05.008

Pre- and Post-test Results

Questionnaire / Age GroupAverage Scores
Before Program 
Average Scores Immediately
After Program
Average Scores One Week
After Program
Dog-human Interaction
Group 1 (Kindergarten)2.163.343.45
Group 2 (Pre-K)1.982.853.15
Group 3 (Pre-School)2.062.612.33
Total2.062.943.02
Contexts for Approaching Dogs
Group 1 (Kindergarten)3.393.533.50
Group 2 (Pre-K)2.933.053.16
Group 3 (Pre-School)2.562.913.23
Total2.963.173.30
Being A Tree
Group 1 (Kindergarten)3.863.85
Group 2 (Pre-K)3.503.52
Group 3 (Pre-School)3.483.65

Research Summary | Back to Top


Primary School

Jump to: Animal Welfare Knowledge & Attitudes Change (Scotland) | Long-Term Dog Bite Trends (Graz, Austria)

Scottish SPCA Humane Education Program Impact on Animal Welfare Knowledge & Attitude

External link: 
Hawkins, RD, Williams, JM & Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, SSPCA 2017, ‘Assessing effectiveness of a nonhuman animal welfare education program for Primary School children’, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 240-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2017.1305272

Change in Knowledge & Attitude by Workshop Session

Pre-TestPost-Test
Knowledge about animals (high score = high knowledge)
Animal Friendly Citizen3.54.9
You and Your Pet46
Wildlife Welfare3.44.9
Food and Farm Animal3.64.5
Control Group3.23.3
Knowledge about Scottish SPCA
Animal Friendly Citizen1.191.1
You and Your Pet1.21.1
Wildlife Welfare1.231.1
Food and Farm Animal1.231.1
Control Group1.261.24
Children’s beliefs about animal minds (low score = high BAM) 
Animal Friendly Citizen1.81.75
You and Your Pet1.81.72
Wildlife Welfare1.81.77
Food and Farm Animal1.81.73
Control Group1.81.78
Attitudes towards animals (low score = positive attitudes) 
Animal Friendly Citizen1.691.68
You and Your Pet1.691.67
Wildlife Welfare1.71.69
Food and Farm Animal1.691.67
Control Group1.71.69
Attitudes towards pet animals (low score = positive attitudes) 
Animal Friendly Citizen1.161.15
You and Your Pet1.161.15
Wildlife Welfare1.171.17
Food and Farm Animal1.161.15
Control Group1.131.16
Attitudes towards wild animals (low score = positive attitudes) 
Animal Friendly Citizen1.161.14
You and Your Pet1.161.13
Wildlife Welfare1.181.15
Food and Farm Animal1.151.12
Control Group1.181.16
Attitudes towards farm animals (low score = positive attitudes) 
Animal Friendly Citizen2019.9
You and Your Pet19.818.9
Wildlife Welfare2020
Food and Farm Animal2019
Control Group2120.8
Attachment to Animals (low score = high attachment)
Animal Friendly Citizen1.141.12
You and Your Pet1.191.11
Wildlife Welfare1.141.13
Food and Farm Animal1.141.1
Control Group1.151.13

Research Summary | Back to Top

Dog Safety Program and Reduced Severity of Dog Bites (Graz, Austria)

External link: 
Kienesberger, B., Arneitz, C., Wolfschluckner, V. et al. Child safety programs for primary school children decrease the injury severity of dog bites. Eur J Pediatr 181, 709–714 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04256-z

Statistics of Dog-Related Incidents Between 2014 and 2018

1. Demographics of Injured Children
  • Age:
    • Total injured children under 15 years: 296
    • Age 0-10 years: 222 (75%)
  • Gender:
    • Male: 148
    • Female: 148 (equal distribution)
2. Circumstances and Timing of Injuries
  • Season: Majority during summer
  • Month: Peak in July (n = 38; 13%)
  • Day of the Week: Peak on Sundays (n = 56; 19%)
3. Type and Severity of Injuries
  • Dog Bites: 212 out of 296 children (71.6%)
    • Severity of Bites:
      • Minor injuries: 195 (92% of bite cases)
    • Location of Bites:
      • Extremities: 100 (47% of bite cases)
      • Head: 95 (45% of bite cases)
      • Trunk: 18 (8% of bite cases)
  • Overall Injury Severity:
    • Severe injuries (requiring surgical intervention): 8% (significantly lower than a previous study’s 26% between 1994 and 2003)
  • Hospitalization: 9.0% of patients (down from 27.5% in 1994-2003)
  • Non-Bite Injuries (n = 84):
    • Falls due to dog pulling leash/jumping: 43 (51%)
    • Injuries related to the dog’s leash: 28 (33%)
    • Falls over the dog: 11 (13%)
    • Other: 2 (3%)
4. Characteristics of the Dogs Involved in Bite Cases (n = 212)
  • Breed Identification: Breed could be determined in 183 cases (86%)
  • Size of Known Breeds: All distinct known breeds were classified as large.
  • Exception: Dachshund accounted for 5 bites (2.7% of bite cases).
  • Familiarity of Dog:
    • Familiar dog: 146 cases (69%)
      • Own dog: 49 cases (23% of all bite cases)
    • Unfamiliar dog: 66 cases (31%)

Research Summary | Back to Top

Scroll to Top